|
PAPER INDUSTRY WEB (PIW) WOUND ROLL TESTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS
There are several reasons why a ROLL PRODUCER may want to test the roll structure of shipping rolls (or jumbo reels): To determine the cause of specific roll defects such as crepe wrinkles or corrugations. As an aid to establishing the winding criteria of a newly installed winder or major rebuild of a winder or reel. As a quality control tool to check rolls before they are shipped to an end user. A CONVERTER may want to check shipping rolls received from a roll producer: To determine how specific roll irregularities effect the efficiency of their machine. To supply creditable data to enable the roll producer to understand and resolve his concerns. A major consideration of roll testing is the time and cost involved. Some testers are costly in themselves, some testers are automatic and can be used on the machine in real time such as a roll density analyzer. Others can be labor intensive and destructive such as the Cameron Strain Test or "J" Line testing. The more popular testers are the handhold units such as the Beloit Rho Meter, the Schmidt Hammer and Smith Needle. Still another consideration, when choosing the type of tester to use is the ability of the tester to profile the roll diameter (MD) or across the winder face (CD). Testers like the Gap test, the J-line, the roll analyzer and the Smith needle are suited for testing profiles from the core to the OD but are not effective in cross winder direction. Conversely, The Beloit Rho Meter and the Schmidt Hammer are effective in the cross winder direction but not suitable for diameter profiling. Regardless of the type of tester used, sampling size will have a great impact on the results of testing (and cost). Sound testing results rely on the statistical data and the data interpretation. The results of this testing will not only effect the winding process but can be useful in making changes in the paper machine process to eliminate root causes of some of the defects generated during the winding, shipping and converting processes. There are many causes of poor shipping roll quality including the many properties of paper. Some of those paper properties have a great impact on the roll structure. Unfortunately, many of the paper properties can not be changed due to economic or equipment considerations. This paper limits the discussion to tools used to test roll structure-the roll hardness and roll profile of the shipping roll. As background to this discussion, for those not experienced in wound roll structure, it may be useful to review Wound Roll Structure and TNT The Tools of the Winding Trade, two papers previously posted in this series. The most basic tool used for roll testing is "the backtenders helper," a simple short length of stick used to manually strike the roll surface to judge the hardness and profile by the sound and "feel" of the stick impacting the roll surface. This is not a safe practice while machines are running and the absence of a means to quantify the test limits the value of the backtenders stick to a subjective determination of roll structure. WIT-WOT TESTING.
The WIT WOT is also useful when evaluating paper property or equipment changes from stock prep through the winding processes.
Many winder builders offer a service to temporarily fit up a portable density analyzer to monitor a winder over a period of time. A continuing printout will permit evaluation of the roll structure off the winder. This service is also useful when studying reel or supercalender wind-up conditions. It should be remembered that a roll analyzer can only measure roll structure by diameter and not across the winder face (CD). Regardless of this limitation, the density analyzer is a very valuable tool for monitoring wound roll structure.
The gap test in summary: With the roll resting on
the floor, loose outer wraps are removed to expose a uniform, clean outer wrap.
The outer wrap is slit across the face. The gap that results is measured and
applied to a formula to establish wound in tension or wound in stress. The
accuracy of the test is dependent on the care taken by the person doing the
test, the number of consecutive wraps tested, the number of tests across the
roll face and axially through the roll. Cameron described the test procedure in the early 60s as follows:
(A) Residual strain = (Gap/(PI*diam))*100
(B) PLI = (Gap/(PI*diam)) * Caliper * Modulus of
elasticity
The procedure hasn't changed since the above description appeared in TAPPI Standards. Experience indicates that using multiple layer testing and increased number of incidences of gap measuring across the face of the roll as roll width increases, result in improved statistical results. Many labs and paper mills use the gap test frequently for roll structure analysis. The only tools needed are a tape measure, a magnifying glass with graduations to .0005", a calculator and marker pen. For a more detail discussion, review The Cameron Gap Test and The Cameron Gap Test Gap 2, two papers previously published in this series.
The greater the deformation the more likelihood that defects can occur during the unwinding process-particularly close to the core. The J-line tests outlined, can be repeated after making process changes to reduce slipping/and or gearing to determine if the changes were effective in reducing layer to layer slippage.
The Rho Meter and Schmidt Hammer can be used to check the profile from core to OD by doing destructive testing similar to the procedure used in Gap testing.
Luigi Bagnato-Paper
Industry Web
REFERENCE PAPER RECOMMENDATION In the need for brevity, this paper is limited in the amount of detail regarding the use of testers and the requirement for sound use and statistical sampling. For those interested in detailed information on roll testing, a paper by David R. Roisum, titled "ROLL QUALITY MEASUREMENT" is highly recommended. A reprint is available in the TAPPI PROCEEDINGS, 1988 Finishing & Converting Conference. A copy can probably be obtained by contacting TAPPI Press. CREDITS
References:
|